Digital photography - Is It Art?

With the introduction of photography and computerised post-processing, there is much conversation these days about the "validity" of photography as an art type. Performers who colour using conventional techniques such as oil and watercolour might respect electronic art or electronically improved pictures as being somehow substandard, as they consider that electronic techniques are less time-consuming and need less expertise than actually implementing colour to fabric or document.

As an periodic specialist myself I would believe the fact that a careful making in oil on fabric of a scenery, for example, would take far more time than it took me to post-process a picture of a identical field. In the arms of a very skilled specialist an unique artwork might well be more eye-catching than a picture of the same topic. It's a issue of personal flavor and reasoning.

However, several things need to be carried in mind here. First of all, the photographer needs to be actually in the right place at the perfect time, with the right digital camera and the right lens, the right configurations, etc., and the record carries on. A feeling of structure, creating, viewpoint and many other aspects also come into perform. During the post-processing stage, the photographer has to choose and comprehend the application, and implement the preferred results skilfully and attractively. Whereas the specialist can properly use any picture as a referrals for his perform, the photographer must only use his own perform to generate the ultimate picture.

With a artwork, there is an "original", i.e. the artwork itself. With a electronic picture, let's be sincere, there is no original: it is nothing more nor less than a laptop or computer computer file. This delivers me to my last point: many the art which is marketed online is a photography create, whether it is a picture of a artwork or illustrating, a item of electronically designed art, a controlled picture or a picture per se, it is quite simply the same thing: a photography create of a electronic laptop or computer file. Contacting it a "giclée" create or whatever does not make it more useful or suitable.

So, what is preferable? A picture of a artwork, a photograph which looks like a artwork, or a photograph which looks like a photo? The response of course is that it is what the customer discovers most eye-catching and whether it fulfils the need he or she has for a particular picture. Art is art, whether it is excellent art, bad art, fairly art, unpleasant art - elegance is in the eye of the observer, always supposing that art has to be wonderful, which of course it doesn't.

Just as a photographer should not ignore the art of a designer, the communicate should also implement. All art types are similarly legitimate, especially when it comes to purchasing photography printing of works of art on the internet.